Legal Opinion

Central National Bank v. Baime

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 23, 1982No. 81-525PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

This action was brought by plaintiff Central National Bank in Chicago (Central) to recover on defendant’s unpaid note. Defendant’s answer and counterclaim were stricken and a default entered against him for failure to comply with discovery rules and rulings. Central’s damages were heard by a jury which was directed to return a verdict for Central upon which judgment was entered. Defendant’s post-trial motions were denied and he appeals, raising as issues the propriety of the imposed sanctions and the sufficiency of damage evidence.

For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

The odyssey of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. BuaIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ostendorf v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Williams v. A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Fine Arts Distributors v. Hilton Hotel Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Freehill v. De Witt County Service Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Petrik v. Monarch Printing Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Reynolds v. ColemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Diamond Mortgage Corp. v. ArmstrongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API