Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Coleman
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 1, 1988No. 86-2035PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley
The present dispute arises out of a partnership agreement between John Coleman (Coleman), the defendant, and his former attorneys Thomas A. Reynolds, Jr. (Reynolds), the plaintiff, and Kenneth G. Pigott (Pigott), a nominal defendant, relating to the Whitehall Hotel (Whitehall) located at 105 and 111 East Delaware Place in Chicago. After a bench trial, the trial court awarded Reynolds and Pigott each $953,465 for their respective shares in the partnership, and Coleman appeals, challenging the court’s construction of the partnership and its valuation of the partnership assets. For the following…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rakowski v. LucenteIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Berutti v. Dierks Foods, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Forest Preserve District v. KrolIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Schroeder v. Meier-Templeton Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Harris v. American General Finance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Reger Development, LLC v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Tas Distributing Company, Incorporated v. Cummins Engine Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. W.R. Grace & Co. And Grace Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Hamer Holding Group, Inc. v. ElmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Harrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.