Legal Opinion

Hunneman v. Lowell Institution for Savings

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 21, 1911Published

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The facts concerning this litigation are fully set forth in the former appeal and need not be recited, nor the grounds of decision which established the right of the surety company in the name of the plaintiff, who was the judgment creditor, to reach and apply the money in the possession of the bank in satisfaction of the judgment, reviewed. Hunneman v. Lowell Institution for Savings, 205 Mass. 441.

It there appeared from the officer’s return, that the execution was levied as of the date of the seizure, and not as of the date when the equity of redemption, which had been turned into money by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunneman v. Lowell Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Owen v. NeveauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Cowles v. DickinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Hunneman v. PhelpsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API