Legal Opinion

State v. Yancey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1966PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

At least six issu'es are raised, which will be considered seriatim. The first question is whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction of the defendant. At the trial the state called as witnesses two men who had been victims of armed robberies, a detective who had worked on the case, and two alleged coconspirators of the defendant. One of these coconspir-ators, James Preston, invoked his privilege against self-incrimination; the other, Charles Underwood, testified and made out all the elements of the crime of conspiracy to commit armed robbery by the defendant. In general,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Sparkman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. BergenthalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Price v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Ramer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Rudolph v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API