Legal Opinion

Yost v. Irwin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1912No. 7434PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Brror to Weld District Court. — -Hon. Harry P. Gamble, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Musser

In the court below,- Yost brought an action on a promissory note. The defendant, Irwin, filed a general demurrer to the complaint. Afterward, and before the disposition of the general demurrer, the defendant, on application supported by *270affidavit, was permitted, over the objections of the plaintiff, to withdraw the. general demurrer and to file a special one, setting up that it appeared on the face of the complaint that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. Oln hearing, the special demurrer was sustained. Thereupon, on motion of the defendant, the action was dismissed, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunt v. HaytSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Spaur v. McBeeOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Buckingham v. OrrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  4. Jennings v. RickardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  5. Brown v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jasper v. BicknellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  2. Kingdom of Gilpin Mines, Inc. v. McNeillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  3. Matteson v. AckersonMontana Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API