Legal Opinion

Buckingham v. Orr

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Circuit Court of Weld County. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.

Suit was brought in this case to recover the

balance due upon the folio-wing instruments of writing:

“$150. Greeley, Col., May 1, 1873.
“Ninety days after date I promise to' pay to the order of Emerson, West & Buckingham, $150, with interest at two per cent, per month from date until due, in advance, *588at the office of Emerson, West & Buckingham, Greeley, Colorado. If not paid when due, to bear interest at three per cent, a month until paid.
“And we hereby authorize and empower any attorney at law, at any time after this obligation becomes due, to appear for us before any court in Colorado or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sennott v. Horner & HypesIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Smith v. Hall & HugginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co. v. American Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  2. Hickerson v. VesselsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  3. Cross v. MoffatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  4. Toothaker v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  5. Hochmark v. RichlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API