Legal Opinion

Mauldin v. Ball

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

EROM SI-IBLBY. Appeal ill error from tbe Circuit Court of Sbelby County. L. PI. Estes, J. -

1Opinion of the CourtWiuK.ES, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. The charge is that White swore out a warrant before a Justice of the Peace for Mauldin’s arrest, charging him with obtaining money under false pretense, and that Ball procured him to commence and continue the prosecution. Mauldin waived examination before the Justice of the Peace, and was bound over to the Criminal Court. No indictment was found by the grand jury, and he was discharged, and he thereupon brought the present suit. There was a trial before the Court and a jury, and a verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff has appealed.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. VanmeterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1844
  2. Marks & Co. v. HastingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Stanton v. HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Beihofer v. LoeffertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Murphy v. LarsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. Cooper v. FlemmingTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Meraz v. ValenciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Russell v. ChamberlainIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Miller v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API