Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Gilbert

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided January 19, 1979No. NCM 78 0948Published

1DissentMichel, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

While I agree that the marijuana was lawfully seized from appellant by Sergeant McGee, I am constrained to conclude that the substance methamphetamine was not.

Sergeant McGee, while functioning as his company’s duty NCO, stumbled upon the casually seated grouping of appellant and two companions in a barracks squadbay. With his presence going unnoticed for several seconds, Sergeant McGee was able to observe a plastic bag on appellant’s lap which appeared to contain green vegetable matter. During this period of observation Sergeant McGee’s impression of the nature of this…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API