Legal Opinion
Weisbrod v. Lutz
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 23, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
190 N.J. Super. 181 (1983)
462 A.2d 610
FERDINAND G. WEISBROD AND VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, A NEW JERSEY PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
NATHAN LUTZ AND DORIS LUTZ, HIS WIFE, PAUL SIESSER AND CAROL SIESSER, HIS WIFE, NATHAN LUTZ AND DORIS LUTZ AND PAUL SIESSER AND CAROL SIESSER, TRADING AS LOCKERIDGE REALTY COMPANY, A PARTNERSHIP, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 7, 1983.
Decided June 23, 1983.
Before Judges FRITZ, JOELSON and PETRELLA.
Walter R. Cohn argued the cause for appellants.
Douglas S. Brierley argued the cause for respondents (Schenck,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Donovan v. BachstadtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Century Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v. Van GlahnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Barry M. Dechtman, Inc. v. Sidpaul Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Stehr v. SawyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Brower v. Glen Wild Lake Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- East Brunswick v. East Mill Assoc. Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Sgro v. Getty Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- In re the Estate of SantolinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Shinn v. SchaalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- H.B. VS. P.S. (FM-02-2624-11, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019