Legal Opinion

Pearman v. Schlaak

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1978Published

1Opinion of the Court

575 S.W.2d 462 (1978)

Virgil PEARMAN and Wilma Pearman, his wife, Movants,

v.

Virginia SCHLAAK et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

November 21, 1978.

D. Michael Coyle, Huddleston, Van Zant & Coyle, Elizabethtown, for movants.

Nicholas L. Pearl, Pearl, Pearl & Pearl, Radcliff, for respondents.

JONES, Justice.

This is a discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals reversing a judgment of the Hardin Circuit Court which denied Virginia Schlaak, et al, the right to intervene nine days after judgment was entered in an action between the Pearmans against City of Radcliff, Kentucky…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Wolpe v. PoretskyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  4. Dillon Companies, Inc. v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. Hukle v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API