Legal Opinion
Merando, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 16, 1973No. 780-71PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKhNzig, Judge
In this government contract case, the court is being asked by cross motions for summary judgment to review a decision1 of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the Board) pursuant to the Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-22 (1970).
*25The issue ’for consideration is whether‘fhe confráótoF is entitled to damages for work’done outside óf 4h admittedly misdrawn /‘contract limit' line’*, Fop the .reasons ¡that follow.; we hold that the ■prai'btiff-contrlictdf is not entitled ¡to recover as a matter of taw.2 . .¡ ,.,i. .
The contract in issue, No. DA44-110-(EN;Gy6020, was for the construction of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Space Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- International Telephone & Telegraph v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Hrh Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wickham Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Gresham, Smith & Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Bayou Land & Marine Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Maintenance Engineers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Franchi Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.