Legal Opinion
Wright v. Vickaryous
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1980No. 4580PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
On January 8, 1977 Vickaryous bought forty-five head of cattle from Wright at an auction sale. His bid was $13,032.50. Unknown to Vickaryous at the time, the Farmer’s Home Administration, the Northwest Livestock Production Credit Association, and the State of Alaska Revolving Loan Fund each held perfected and filed security interests on the cattle. However, they had consented to the auction sale of the cattle in conversations with Wright. Thus, under the terms of section 9-306(2) of the Uniform Commercial Code as enacted in Alaska, their security interests were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Amer. Container Corp. v. Hanley Trucking Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Ricklefs v. ClemensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Chugach Electric Ass'n v. Northern Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Ficke v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Stuart v. University Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Hermandad Unida de Carpinteros y Ebanistas de América v. V. & E. Engineering Construction Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1984
- Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Lakeview Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Darragh Poultry & Livestock Equipment Co. v. Piney Creek Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Frank Arnold Contractors, Inc. v. Vilsmeier Auction Company, Inc., and Itt Industrial Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.