Legal Opinion

Lambourne v. Manchester Country Properties, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 5, 1977No. 355-75PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.

Plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, was employed by the defendant real estate agency under an oral agreement whereby she was to receive 50% of commissions earned from any sale she brought about. If the original listing had been secured by another broker, that broker received 10% of the commission, and plaintiff’s share would be 45%, or half the net after that payment. She sold listed premises belongingto one Coombs, involving a $7000 commission, which Coombs did not pay. Defendant sued Coombs and recovered a judgment, which is uncollected, for the $7000 plus costs. In so doing it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Linsley v. LovelySupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
  2. Pond v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  3. Moncion v. BertrandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  4. Newton v. Smith Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  5. J. E. Smith & Co. v. Russell Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Valentine v. Ormsbee Exploration Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Peter Stemkowski v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Nzomo v. Vermont State CollegesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API