Alexander v. . Alexander
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The language used by the testator in the third item of his will clearly conveys his intention. In substance be says: “I lend to my wife the balance of my estate . . . for and during her widowhood” with full power of disposition, “and at the termination of her preceding particular estate the balance of my estate to be equally divided between my two children.”
The word “lend” used in this item of the will was equivalent to “give” or “devise.” Jarman v. Day, 179 N. C., 318; Smith v. Smith, 173 N. C., 124; Sessoms v. Sessoms, 144 N. C., 121.
The devise to his wife during her widowhood limited the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carroll v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Sessoms v. . SessomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Chewning v. . MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Roane v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Fellowes v. . DurfeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hampton v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Rudisill v. HoyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Hardee v. . RiversSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Blackwood v. BlackwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.