Legal Opinion

NJ Lenders Corp. v. Cosentino

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 26, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order, entered March 28, 2008, modified, upon search of the record, to grant defendant Cosentino and defendant law firm O’Connor, McGuiness, Conte, Doyle and Oleson summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them; as modified, order affirmed, without costs.

*13Defendants McNally and Valencia sought to purchase a plot of land in Red Hook, New York and construct a home on that land. Plaintiff alleges that it agreed to make a $60,000 bridge loan to McNally and Valencia in connection with that real estate purchase, and that McNally’s New Jersey property was to serve as…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Peters Griffin Woodward, Inc. v. WCSC, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Anesthesia Associates v. Northern Westchester Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Wolf v. National Council of Young IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API