Legal Opinion

Murad v. Witek

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 23, 1964No. Gen. 49,139PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dempsey

The plaintiff brought this suit for personal injuries sustained when his automobile collided with the rear of the defendant’s automobile. At the close of the plaintiff’s case the court directed a verdict for the defendant. The only issue on appeal is whether the plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law.

The plaintiff, who was the only witness in the case, testified that he was driving west on Diversey Avenue in the City of Chicago about 3:00 a. in. on the morning of December 24, 1955. He was traveling in the left lane nearest the center line at approximately 25 miles per hour.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. Reynolds & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  2. Lutz v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. Wojtowicz v. SarnoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scardina v. CollettiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  2. Madrazo v. MichaelsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. Moore v. Checker Taxi Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  4. Breslin v. BatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Winston v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API