Gauthier v. City of Red Bluff
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
Red Bluff’s fire chief is not a peace officer.
In this case we construe provisions of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (the Act) (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq.; further unspecified section references are to the Government Code). At issue is the interplay between provisions of the Act which define those persons entitled to its protections and provisions of the Penal Code which define who are peace officers. We conclude plaintiff Gauthier is not covered by the Act and therefore the trial court properly declined his petition for a writ of mandamus to compel…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- County of Santa Clara v. Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n of Santa Clara County, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Service Employees International Union Local 715 v. City of Redwood CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- County of Colusa v. CharterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. PenningtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Opinion No. (1997), California Attorney General Reports1997
- Opinion No. (1999), California Attorney General Reports1999
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.