Legal Opinion

United States v. Ladoucer

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 28, 2009No. 08-3177PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

A jury found Todd Richard Ladoucer guilty of aiding and abetting the sale of a stolen firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j), aiding and abetting the sale of a firearm to a prohibited person in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(d), and being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Ladoucer appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court 1 erred by allowing him to proceed pro se and by finding that his Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process was not violated; abused its discretion by finding that the Government did not commit…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael BernardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Martin SigillitoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  3. David R. Desimone v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. George GeorgiouCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API