Legal Opinion

Ritter v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 7, 1936No. 43333PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeeen, Judge

The plaintiff, who had been appointed a Judge of a District Court of the United States, brings this suit to recover the salary appurtenant to this office from April 1, 1936, to *294and including April 30, 1936, in the sum of $833.33 which has not been paid to him. In his petition the plaintiff sets out the commission which he had received appointing him a District Judge signed by the President on February 15, 1929, and alleges that he performed the duties of his office until prevented from so doing by reason of impeachment proceedings against him. The petition shows that in March 1936 the House…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mississippi v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Ferguson v. MaddoxTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Ferguson v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Trapp v. ChambersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. People ex rel. Robin v. HayesNew York Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mecham v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Walter L. Nixon, Jr. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  3. Kinsella v. JaekleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Hastings v. US Senate, Impeachment Trial Com.District Court, District of Columbia · 1989
  5. Mecham v. Arizona House of RepresentativesArizona Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API