Legal Opinion

Kinsella v. Jaekle

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 17, 1984No. 12270; 12356PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeziale, C. J.

This case concerns a challenge to the constitutionality of an investigation to consider impeachment proceedings currently being conducted by a select committee of the Connecticut House of Representatives. The matter has come before this court both on appeal from an interlocutory order of the trial court and on reservation by the trial court of several questions of law for our advice. Under the circumstances of this case, we hold that the Superior Court does not have jurisdiction to hear the plaintiff’s action.

The parties have stipulated to the following relevant facts: The plaintiff, James H.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Massameno v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Circle Lanes of Fairfield, Inc. v. FaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Mecham v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API