Legal Opinion

Dunnigan v. Murray Transp. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 23, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoolsey, District Judge

(after all parties had rested at the end of the case).

*503I hold Joseph Dunnigan in criminal contempt of this court for having willfully testified falsely regarding a material matter in these causes.

I. In open court, just before we adjourned yesterday, I told Mr. Ash, the counsel for the libelant, Catherine Dunnigan, that in my opinion Joseph Dunnigan, her son, had consciously and willfully perjured himself in the evidence which he had given on this trial when he said he was on board the scow Dunnigan Sisters on Sunday evening, January 20, 1929, and saw the accident.

II. I was coming to this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. BurnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Panama Railroad v. Napier Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. United States Trucking Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  4. Schoonmaker v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  5. The ImpDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Valentine v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938
  2. United States v. JohansenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  3. Conners Marine Co. v. Delaware, L. & W. R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API