State v. . Blankenship
Supreme Court of North Carolina
INDICTMENT for forcible entry and detainer, tried at June' Term of the Criminal Court for Madison county, before Ewart, J., and a jury. The defendant was convicted and appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, J.:
-The defendant asked certain instructions which were not given. The refusal is deemed excepted to, but, if the exception is not set out by the appellant in stat ing his case on appeal, it is waived. Taylor v. Plummer, 105 N. C., 56; Marshall v. Stine, 112 N. C., 697; Davis v. Duval, 112 N. C., 833. Indeed, no exception whatever appears to have been made, and, no error appearing upon the face of the record proper, the judgment must be affirmed. See numerous cases cited in Clark’s Code, p. 582, subhead, “Where no errors are assigned.”
Affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taylor v. . PlummerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Davis v. . DuvalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Marshall v. . StineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hicks v. Kenan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Cunningham v. . CunninghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Sawyer v. . Lumber CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Sawyer v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Wilson v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899