Hicks v. Kenan.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
MOTION TO AFFIRM. Per Guriam: Plaintiff moved in' tbis court to affirm the judgment upon the ground that defendant had not stated her exceptions nor assigned errors, as directed by Rulé 27, of this court. The Code, section 550, required, and it is the law now, that the-appellant in his case on'appeal should “state separately, in articles numbered, the errors alleged.” Rule 27 is to the same effect.
Read the full summary
MOTION TO AFFIRM. Per Guriam: Plaintiff moved in' tbis court to affirm the judgment upon the ground that defendant had not stated her exceptions nor assigned errors, as directed by Rulé 27, of this court. The Code, section 550, required, and it is the law now, that the-appellant in his case on'appeal should “state separately, in articles numbered, the errors alleged.” Rule 27 is to the same effect. Clark’s Code, p. 920. It provides that “every appellant shall set out, in the statement of the case served on appeal, his exceptions to the pleadings, rulings and judgment of the court, briefly and…
1Opinion of the Court
MOTION TO AFFIRM. ON THE MERITS. MOTION TO AFFIRM. (338) Plaintiff moved in this Court to affirm the judgment upon the ground that defendant had not stated her exceptions nor assigned errors, as directed by Rule 27, of this Court. The Code, section 550, required, and it is the law now, that the appellant in his case on appeal should "state separately, in articles numbered, the errors alleged." Rule 27 is to the same effect. Clark's Code, p. 920. It provides that "every appellant shall set out, in the statement of the case served on appeal, his exceptions to the pleadings, rulings and judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Taylor v. . PlummerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Wilson v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Basnight v. Southern Jobbing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Insurance Co. v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Globe Yarn Mills, Inc. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.