Legal Opinion

National Finance Company of Utah v. Valdez

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1961No. 9137PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice.

Action, upon a promissory note and chattel mortgage. The defendant appeals from an adverse judgment.

*341' Plaintiff’s complaint, in addition to the -usual allegations concerning the execution of the note and defendant’s default, alleged that the defendant, prior to obtaining the loan and as an inducement therefor, submitted a written financial statement to plaintiff which was false and fraudulent. Defendant filed an answer containing what is substantially a general denial and also, .as an affirmative defense, alleged that he had been adjudicated a bankrupt and that plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Argall v. . JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Harry F. White, Bankrupt v. Public Loan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  3. Ohio Finance Co. v. GreathouseOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Stewart v. EmersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. CritchfieldCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  2. National Finance Company of Provo v. DaleyUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Beneficial Finance Co. of Charleston v. CollinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Local Industrial Finance Company v. McDougaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  5. Daniels v. Deutsche Bank National TrustCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API