Legal Opinion

Pilgrims Health & Life Insurance v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 5, 1930No. 20211PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. The only special ground of the motion for a new trial alleges.that the court erred in instructing the jury as follows: .“And I charge you that the failure to state a material fact, if not done fraudulently, does not void, but the willful concealment of such a fact, which would enhance the risk, will void the policy.” This excerpt from the charge is a part of § 2481 of the Civil Code of 1910, and, as an abstract proposition of law, is correct. However, it was alleged to be error because it was confusing and misleading to the jury. Eor neither of these reasons did the court err in giving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blaylock v. Walker County BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  2. Hill Bros. v. RenderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Vaughn, James v. FairleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API