Legal Opinion

First Bank of Boaz v. Fielder

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1991No. 1901098PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, First Bank of Boaz ("the Bank"), appeals from a judgment entered on a $104,000 jury verdict for the plaintiff, Helen Fielder, who, individually, and as administratrix of the estate of her husband, D.B. Fielder, had alleged fraud in connection with a home improvement loan. We affirm.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, as the applicable standard of review requires us to view it, see Warren v. Ousley, 440 So.2d 1034, 1037 (Ala. 1983) (dealing with sufficiency of the evidence), shows the following: The Fielders went to the Bank to discuss the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Gulf Atlantic Life Ins. Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Blumberg v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Old Southern Life Insurance Company v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Surrency v. HarbisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Ex Parte Grand Manor, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte Norwood Hodges Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Marija Wolff, Individually And/or as of the Estate of C. Robert Wolff v. Allstate Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. St. Clair Federal Sav. Bank v. RozelleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API