Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Eaton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1926No. 26,522PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The question involved is when privilege must be exercised to avoid civil process served in this state on a nonresident present in the state at the trial of a criminal action against him, and pursuant to bond given for his appearance.

While the plaintiff, Mary J. Eaton, and her husband, Ross A. Eaton, the defendant, were domiciled in Texas, they separated under circumstances which qualified the wife to acquire a separate domicile in Kansas. In February, 1923, she. commenced an action for divorce and alimony, and service was made on defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Underwood v. FoshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Eastern Kansas Oil Co. v. BeutnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Wells v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. Bolz v. CroneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Reiff v. TresslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schwarz v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  2. Dunn v. City of EmporiaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  3. Frank W. Atkinson and Henry C. Hitch v. Carol A. Jory and Deborah A. Hughes, Trustees and David M. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  4. Jack Schwarz and Irwin Schwarz, T/a Jack Schwarz and Son v. William M. Thomas, Jack Schwarz and Irwin Schwarz, T/a Jack Schwarz and Son v. Frances Wood ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  5. Thomas v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API