Arizona Corporation Commission v. Superior Court
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Vice Chief Justice.
The Arizona Corporation Commission (hereinafter referred to as Commission or petitioner), after notice and hearing, issued Decision No. 40890 establishing interim rates to be charged in certain divisions or water service areas of the respondent Arizona Water Company (hereinafter referred to as Company). The Company filed a special action proceeding in the superior court seeking to have Decision No. 40890 set aside. Respondent court granted an Interlocutory Stay of Proceedings preventing Decision No. 40890 from becoming effective pending the outcome of the special…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Börs v. PrestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Simms v. Round Valley Light & Power CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Davenport Water Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Rios v. SymingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Arizona Corp. Commission v. State Ex Rel. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Neely v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.