Legal Opinion

State v. Papineau

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 2, 1985No. 2 CA-CR 3283PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Judge.

Defendant, convicted of possession of marijuana, raises two issues on appeal concerning the propriety of the search leading to the discovery of the marijuana. The first, that the affidavit in support of the application for a warrant did not demonstrate probable cause and that the failure to raise that issue constituted ineffective assistance of counsel, is without merit. The affidavit recited firsthand recent knowledge of marijuana on the premises to be searched by an informer of demonstrated credibility. This satisfies the rigid test of Spinelli v. United States, 393…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. DeLutisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Mazepink v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Artis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Bruce v. Chas Roberts Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Righter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API