Hobbs v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Larry D. Hobbs challenges his conviction on three counts of professional gambling as proscribed by § 6-7-102(b), W.S.1977. This conviction resulted from appellant’s involvement in a lucrative bookmaking operation in Cheyenne, Wyoming. The primary question presented for review is whether the statutory definition of professional gambling is unconstitutionally vague. In addition, the State, as appellee, questions appellant’s standing to present his vagueness challenge.
We affirm.
Appellant describes the issue in this manner:
“THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO DISMISS…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Giles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Worcester v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Moore v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. JuarezWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.