Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Ancell
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 17, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., S.
This is a contested discovery proceeding in which respondent Frances K. Pliska (Pliska) moves to renew or reargue that portion of the order of this court dated January 7, 2002, which denied her cross motion for summary judgment under Banking Law § 675. The motion is opposed by the executrixes of the estate of Nathan S. Ancell. The motion to reargue is denied, and the motion to renew is granted. Upon renewal, the court adheres to its original determination.
*253A motion to renew must be based on new facts or a demonstrated change in the law (see, CPLR…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re the Estate of CamardaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In Re the Accounting of FenelonNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- In re the Estate of TimoshevichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re the Estate of BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re the Estate of CoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Drucker v. Grodetzky (In re Grodetzky)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- In re the Estate of ButtaNew York Surrogate's Court · 2002