Legal Opinion

City of Richmond v. Thompson's Heirs

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 12, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond in a condemnation proceeding. Judgment for the defendants. Petitioner assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

This is a proceeding instituted by the city of Bichmond against the heirs of W. M. Thompson, deceased, and others, to condemn for its purposes as a public alley a thirteen foot strip of land, or certain interests therein, used as a private alley, as shown by the plat below:

*180The parties -defendant to this proceeding, other than the Thompson heirs, entered into an agreement with the city of Richmond, before the hearing of the canse, by which the city acquired their interests in the thirteen foot alley in rear of the lot fronting 100 feet on Marshall street.

When commissioners were appointed to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haberman v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Taylor v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1863
  3. Meyer v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. In re RobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Peck v. DennistonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. MacCorkle v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Bond v. GreenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  3. Cogito v. DartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  4. Talbot v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  5. Williams v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API