Legal Opinion

Shaikh v. Burwell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1992No. 9110SC169PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Judge.

On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment and in granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Defendant asserts his motion for summary judgment should have .been allowed for two reasons. First, the agreement between defendant and the Lyles allowed defendant to use the proceeds from the sale to discharge the senior Banc-Boston lien. Second, plaintiffs by their actions ratified the use of the proceeds to pay off the senior lien and therefore cannot maintain an action against defendant for $87,889.71 as being “surplus.” We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sprouse v. North River InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Bobbitt v. . StantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Sprouse v. North River Ins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Brett v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Merchants Bank & Trust Co. of Winston-Salem v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conversion Properties, L.L.C. v. Kessler, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
  2. Brickyard Associates v. Auburn Venture PartnersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Hobco Auto Sales, Inc. v. DewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API