Legal Opinion
Burkhart v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1955No. 13425_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
227 F.2d 659
Andrew J. BURKHART and Lillie Burkhart, his wife; John H. O'Brien and Agnes O'Brien, his wife; and Andrew J. Burkhart and John H. O'Brien, a copartnership, doing business as Petroleum Products, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Irwin A. Falk and Vuelta C. Falk, his wife, Appellees.
No. 13425.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
June 28, 1955.
T. C. Boyle, Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hart Snyder, Special Atty., Dept. of Justice, Spokane, Wash., S. Billingsley Hill, Roger P. Marquis, John C. Harrington, Attys., Dept. of Justice,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- A. W. Duckett & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Honolulu Plantation Co. Honolulu Plantation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Sunset Cemetery Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. 1.377 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. 32.42 Acres of Land, More or Less, Located in San Diego CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. 194.08 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998