Legal Opinion

Vermont Development Credit Corp. v. Kitchel

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 11, 1988No. 85-546PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment against him as guarantor of eight promissory notes on which Burke Mountain Recreation, Inc. was the principal borrower. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

The issues on appeal are: (1) whether the plaintiff, Vermont Development Credit Corporation (VDCC), is required to be licensed under the Licensed Lenders Act, chapter 73 of Title 8 (8 V.S.A. §§ 2201-2235), thus making one of the notes unenforceable under the terms of that Act; and (2) whether defendant is, in effect, a co-signer rather than a guarantor, thereby making six of the notes and guaranties…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Andrus v. Glover Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Hill v. ConwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  5. In re A. C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. State v. MadisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. State v. CaronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. In Re Hinsdale FarmSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. Human Rights Commission v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API