Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Brodt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 28, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard Prendergast, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGarnett, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by appellant to recover commissions for sale of real estate, which he alleges he made for appellee in pursuance of this written authority:

“ Chicago, December 10, 1887.
“ J. H. Farrar,
“ Dear Sir:—You are hereby given the exclusive agency for the sale of my property, 640 Fullerton avenue, together with the ground, 30x174 feet to the alley, for the sum of $10,250 or $10,000 net. The above agency is given to February 1, 1888.

Charles Brodt.”

The property was conveyed to W. P. Dunn, by Brodt, through J. P. Sayer & Co., real estate brokers, about March 21, 1888.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glascock v. VanfleetTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Leadville Mining Co. v. HemphillArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Brown v. OdnealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Griffith v. ShofnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Reed v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API