Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Payne

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1924No. 533-3729PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChapman, J.

Plaintiff, Pearl McConnell, recovered judgment in the district court against defendant, Jno. Barton Payne, Agent, for $1,360.50, for loss of baggage in an intrastate carriage by a railroad. The Court of Civil Appeals reduced the judgment to $100, for the reason that the railroad, at the time of carriage of the baggage, was under federal control, and the following tariff was in effect:

“Rule 10. (a) Subject to limitations shown in rule 9 [immaterial to the question made by the record], 150 pounds of baggage,' not exceeding $100 in value, may be checked without additional charge for each adult…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. LangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. South Dakota Ex Rel. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Public Service Commission v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Hines v. BurnettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neubert v. Chicago, Rock Island & Gulf Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Greyhound Corp. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Lancaster v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API