Legal Opinion

St. Louis v. Perlitz

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 31, 2016No. Case No. 3:13-cv-1132(RNC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING AND ORDER

Robert N. Chatigny, United States District Judge

Defendant Father Paul Carrier has moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss two of plaintiff Bernard Michel’s claims: the claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2255(a), alleging a violation of the sex tourism statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2423(c)(count 8); and the claim under 18 U.S.C. § 1595(a), alleging a violation of the sex trafficking statute, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591(a)(count 12). See ECF No. 484. He contends that the § 2255 claim is barred by the statute of limitations and that the § 1595 claim must be dismissed because the sex trafficking statute did…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gabelli v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Jane Doe v. Dean BolandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Singleton v. ClashDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. Shovah v. MercureDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2014

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe 1 v. MG Freesites LTDDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2023
  2. SB v. Wayne CountyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API