Legal Opinion

Williams v. Butterfield

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 31, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Stoddard Circuit Court.- — No». F. B. Bearing, Special Judge. The deeds to Wolfenden and respondents were not constructive notice to Williams; in fact, the deed to ■respondents is not proven: First. The acknowledgment is not according to statute. E. S. 1899, sec. 908. Second. There is no'certificate to the acknowledgment recognized by statute. E. S. 1899, sec. 911. Third. Eespondents’ deed was not entitled to record because not proven or acknowledged.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Stoddard Circuit Court.- — No». F. B. Bearing, Special Judge. The deeds to Wolfenden and respondents were not constructive notice to Williams; in fact, the deed to ■respondents is not proven: First. The acknowledgment is not according to statute. E. S. 1899, sec. 908. Second. There is no'certificate to the acknowledgment recognized by statute. E. S. 1899, sec. 911. Third. Eespondents’ deed was not entitled to record because not proven or acknowledged. E. S. 1899, secs. 823, 9062. Fourth. A deed with a defective acknowledgment and improperly recorded is not constructive notice and…

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

The statement of the facts, and the legal propositions involved arising by reason of said facts, were very clearly and concisely stated in the former consideration of this case; by permission that statement is adopted. It is as follows:

“This is an action to quiet the title to section eleven, township twenty-six, range twelve, in Stoddard county, Missouri. The court dismissed the bill and rendered judgment in favor of defendants for costs. Plaintiff appeals.
“Henry Bohlcke is the common source of title, the plaintiff claiming under and directly from him, and defendants through mesne…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bishop v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Terrell v. Andrew CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hatcher v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Fowles v. BentleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Williams v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Miller v. ProctorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Honea v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API