Legal Opinion
Henry v. Spitler
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 3, 1914PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Writ of Error to Circuit Court for Pinellas County; F. M. Robles, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtShackleford, C. J.
Walter L. Spitler instituted an action of replevin against Harry E. Henry to recover tlie possession of certain described mules. The property was re-delivered to the defendant upon the filing of a forthcoming bond in accordance with the statutory provisions. On the 7th day of April, 1913, the return day of the writ, the defendant entered his special appearance “for the purpose of moving to quash the return to the writ of replevin” and filed the following motion:
*148“The defendant, Harry E. Henry, by his attorneys for the purpose hereinabove stated, and under his special appearance herein filed,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cross v. AbySupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- McKinnon v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
- Corbett v. Physicians' Casualty Ass'n of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Fisher, Sons & Co. v. CrowleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Minick v. MinickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Ortell v. OrtellSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Bank of Jasper v. First Nat. Bank of RomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State Ex Rel. Eli Lilly and Company v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Florida Power Co. v. CasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.