Fisher, Sons & Co. v. Crowley
West Virginia Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court. Cabell Comity. Action by M. Fisher, Sons & Co. against T. H. Crowley .and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring •error.
1Opinion of the Court
POEEENBARGER, JUDGE:
In an action of assumpsit brought in the circuit court of ■Cabell county, by M. Fisher, Sons & Co., against T. H. Crowley, B. L. Priddie and John J. Kearney, the summons, which was issued on the 25th of November, 1903, was made returnable “at rules to be held in the clerk’s office of said ■court on the first Monday in December next.” On the 4th day of April, 1904, the defendants appeared, and, after re■quiring securitji for costs from the plaintiffs, who were nonresidents, craved oyer of the writ, and, after it had been' read to them, moved to quash the same. The motion…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Roberts v. . AllmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Mahany v. KephartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
- St. Lawrence Co. v. HoltWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
- Groves v. County Court of Grant CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Schoonover v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bego v. BegoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- Hall v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
- Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Anderson v. LewisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.