Legal Opinion

Shaudys v. IMO Industries, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 30, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

285 N.J. Super. 407 (1995)

667 A.2d 204

HENRY R. SHAUDYS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 25, 1995.

Decided November 30, 1995.

Before Judges STERN, WALLACE and NEWMAN.

Charles N. Martel argued the cause for appellant (Robert W. Friedland, attorney, Mr. Martel on the brief).

Gary E. Adams argued the cause for respondent (Pellettieri, Rabstein and Altman, attorneys, Mr. Adams on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by NEWMAN, J.A.D.

Respondent IMO Industries, Inc. (IMO) appeals from a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fiore v. Consolidated FreightwaysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Livingstone v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Hammond v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  4. Gargiulo v. GargiuloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  5. Torres v. Trenton Times NewspaperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cannuscio v. Claridge HotelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  2. Zahner v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Sexton v. County of CumberlandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  4. N.G. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. ANTONIO PEREIRA VS. OASIS FOODS (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API