Legal Opinion

United States v. Beach

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 26, 1945No. 620PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was indicted and convicted upon a jury trial, in the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, of transporting another woman in Washington, D. C., for the purpose of prostitution, in violation of the Mann Act. 36 Stat. 825, 18 U. S. C. § 397, et seq. Section 2,18 U. S. C. § 398, makes it a penal offense knowingly to “transport or cause to be trans*194ported, or aid or assist in obtaining transportation for, or in transporting, in interstate . . . commerce, or . . . in the District of Columbia, any woman ... for the purpose of prostitution ... or with the intent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoke & Economides v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Mortensen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Athanasaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Bates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. CameronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Travelers Health Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Crespo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
  4. Hust v. Moore-Mccormick Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. United States v. Maldonado-BurgosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API