Legal Opinion
State v. Moore
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 2, 2004PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wallace
In this search and seizure ease, and in State v. Pineiro, 181 N.J. 13, 853 A.2d 887, 2004 WL 1713631 (2004), also decided today, we consider whether the State had probable cause to conduct a warrantless search of defendant. The trial court and the Appellate Division found probable cause for the law enforcement officers to arrest, and to search and seize the evidence from defendant. We agree and affirm.
I
Defendant Gregory C. Moore was indicted for third-degree possession of cocaine. He filed a motion to suppress the evidence. The sole witness at the suppression hearing was Detective Glen…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- State v. PineiroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- State v. McLeanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- State v. O'NEALSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Brunson v. Affinity Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.