Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ketcham v. Ketcham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 1984No. 78-509E; CA A29895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Defendant was cited to appear and show cause why he should not be adjudged in contempt of court for wilful failure to pay spousal and child support previously ordered by the court. He appeals from the final order adjudging him to be in contempt and sentencing him to six months in jail, contending that the trial court erred in failing to inform him of his right to assistance of court appointed counsel.

At the time of defendant’s appearance, the following colloquy occurred:

“THE COURT: Will you come forward, please. This is a — on a contempt matter. Mr. Ketcham, you have the right to an attorney…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of GorgerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Van Eck v. Van EckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. In the Matter of Marriage of Gorger and GorgerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API