Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Gorger

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 12, 1986No. 81-10-1223; CA A36709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Husband appeals from an order adjudging him in contempt for willful failure to pay child support. He contends that the trial court failed to advise him of the right to appointed counsel.

ORS 33.095 requires the court to inform an alleged contemnor, if unrepresented by counsel, of both the right to counsel and the right to appointed counsel, if the alleged contemnor is indigent and if incarceration may result. Husband appeared for the hearing without counsel. The court did not advise him of his right to appointed counsel. Therefore, we reverse and remand. State ex rel Ketcham v. Ketcham, 68 Or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Ketcham v. KetchamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mead v. BatchlorMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Van Eck v. Van EckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. In the Matter of Marriage of Gorger and GorgerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API