Blazel v. Bradley
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
CRABB, Chief Judge.
This is a civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which plaintiffs ask the court to declare unconstitutional Wis.Stat. § 813.12(3)(b), which permits the issuance of ex parte temporary restraining orders in domestic abuse actions. The case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Jurisdiction is present under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343.
I conclude that Wis.Stat. § 813.12 provides the essential due process protections that are required before the state may constitutionally deprive plaintiffs of the protected liberty and property…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nollet v. Justices of the Trial Court of MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Ferko-Fox v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re the Marriage of FiffeColorado Court of Appeals · 2005