Legal Opinion

Blazel v. Bradley

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 7, 1988No. 87-C-179-CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRABB, Chief Judge.

This is a civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which plaintiffs ask the court to declare unconstitutional Wis.Stat. § 813.12(3)(b), which permits the issuance of ex parte temporary restraining orders in domestic abuse actions. The case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Jurisdiction is present under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343.

I conclude that Wis.Stat. § 813.12 provides the essential due process protections that are required before the state may constitutionally deprive plaintiffs of the protected liberty and property…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nollet v. Justices of the Trial Court of MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
  2. Ferko-Fox v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. In Re the Marriage of FiffeColorado Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API