Legal Opinion
State ex rel. C.T.G. v. M.A.B.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided July 17, 1998No. 1961520 and 1961531PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SEE, Justice.
These petitions concern the reopening of a final judgment of paternity. The trial court allowed á man who had previously been adjudicated the father of a child to proffer deoxy-ribose nucleic acid (“DNA”) evidence indicating that he was not the child’s biological father. The trial court reopened the judgment of paternity, pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 26-17A-1; entered an order finding the previously adjudicated father not to be the child’s biological father; and set aside the earlier order requiring him to pay child support. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. State ex rel.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ex Parte JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998