Legal Opinion

Watson v. Kresse

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1964No. 8038PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUTZ, Judge.

This is an action for specific performance of an option agreement given and executed by the defendants to the DX Sun-ray Oil Company and assigned by DX Sun-ray Oil Company to Watson & Hawkins, Inc., of Fargo, a corporation, and thereafter assigned by Watson & Hawkins, Inc., to John A. Watson, Hjerdis E. Watson, William M. Watson, and Elizabeth Watson, the plaintiffs herein. The answer of the defendants is in the form of a general denial, together with two affirmative defenses: (1) that the defendants had rescinded the agreement prior to the exercise of the option and (2) that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Dixon v. KaufmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Larson v. WoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Mevorah v. GoodmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Gilbert Manufacturing Co. v. BryanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Caisse Nationale De Credit Agricole, a French Banking Corporation v. Cbi Industries, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Renner v. MurrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Smith v. Michael Kurtz Construction CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Peoples Bank and Trust v. ReiffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Zimmerman v. CampbellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API