Legal Opinion
St. Matthew Publishing, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 16, 1998No. 97-569TPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
WEINSTEIN, Judge.
Defendant, pursuant to Rule 26(e) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), has filed a motion for a protective order to limit the scope of plaintiffs RCFC 30(b)(5) and (6) deposition subpoena and subpoena duces tecum.
The subpoena contains three and one-half single-spaced pages of instructions and definitions, and lists 113 “matters or issues” (occupying 16 single-spaced pages) as to which a representative of the government is required to testify, and as to which defendant must provide purportedly relevant facts and supporting…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Nancy Deitchman, Paula Renfroe, and Dr. Arthur L. Herbst, Witness-Appellee v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Lima Surgical Associates, Inc., Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association Plan Trust, Huntington National Bank, Trustee v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Big Mama Rag, Inc., a Colorado Nonprofit Corporation v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Ancient Coin Collectors GuildCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Lakeland Partners, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Jade Trading, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- New Dynamics Foundation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.